Time For:
The Futile Party
Platform!
For a while now the term Feudalism has had dire repute. Associated to a period of disease, upheaval, a misuse of power, a lack of knowledge, economic disasters, the Black Plague, constant wars, and the Crusades, the word Feudal is often confused with terms like: useless, pointless, fruitless, or ineffectual. In fact, the governmental form known as Feudalism–our party root–has worldwide recognition, brand awareness, and longevity. Even with the left wing media associating Feudalism to the Dark Ages.
So what is Feudalism and how might it be practiced today? Simply put, Neo-Feudalism is similar to classical Feudalism, which rather than being a period of chaos, is a system in which an owner lets out assets to an individual, or groups of individuals who pay a rental on the assets by doing work, military service, or servitude to the court. Often maligned, Feudalism is actually a period of limited government controls, a highly diversified free market economy, rule by an informed economic elite, a clear reporting structure, and a population tied to nature.
What could be bad?
And consider how Neo-Feudalism fits into our economic challenge: After the rise of Feudalism, the middle class disappeared; two classes became ubiquitous, the aristocratic bureaucracy and a submissive laboring population. Can’t you see this environment already in our country? The left wing media condemns Feudalism because they say it obliterated an entire class. We of the Futile Party ask, “How would they know the real cause?” “Were they there?” “Can we trust scholars, philosophers, or historians who rely on books from other so-called trusted sources?” We don’t need another shadow force like the climate scientists. We also cannot afford to let the independence of climate scientists spread into other areas. To meet the challenge, the Futile Party proposes our Neo-Feudalist platform because the Futile Party knows how to make a soft landing into large-scale servitude.
Or perhaps you doubt your servile future? Let’s look at the numbers. Consider this chart from the Dept of Labor. The unemployment numbers below take into account the unemployed, long-term unemployed and those who have given up looking for jobs.
(http://www.bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cpsatab15.htm )
Year |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Annual |
1994 |
12.8 |
12.2 |
11.9 |
10.9 |
10.6 |
11.3 |
11.1 |
10.4 |
10.0 |
9.7 |
9.7 |
9.7 |
10.9 |
1995 |
11.1 |
10.5 |
10.3 |
9.8 |
9.8 |
10.4 |
10.4 |
10.0 |
9.7 |
9.3 |
9.6 |
9.7 |
10.1 |
1996 |
10.8 |
10.7 |
10.3 |
9.7 |
9.5 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
9.3 |
9.0 |
8.8 |
8.9 |
9.2 |
9.7 |
1997 |
10.4 |
10.0 |
9.6 |
9.0 |
8.5 |
9.2 |
9.0 |
8.6 |
8.3 |
7.9 |
8.0 |
8.2 |
8.9 |
1998 |
9.3 |
8.9 |
8.9 |
7.7 |
7.6 |
8.4 |
8.5 |
7.8 |
7.6 |
7.3 |
7.2 |
7.3 |
8.0 |
1999 |
8.5 |
8.2 |
7.9 |
7.4 |
7.1 |
7.9 |
7.7 |
7.2 |
7.0 |
6.7 |
6.8 |
6.9 |
7.4 |
2000 |
7.8 |
7.6 |
7.4 |
6.6 |
6.8 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.0 |
6.6 |
6.3 |
6.8 |
6.7 |
7.0 |
2001 |
8.1 |
7.9 |
7.6 |
7.1 |
7.2 |
8.2 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.2 |
8.7 |
9.0 |
9.3 |
8.1 |
2002 |
10.5 |
10.1 |
9.9 |
9.4 |
9.2 |
9.8 |
9.9 |
9.5 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
9.4 |
9.6 |
9.6 |
2003 |
11.0 |
10.8 |
10.4 |
9.8 |
9.7 |
10.6 |
10.5 |
10.0 |
9.8 |
9.5 |
9.7 |
9.6 |
10.1 |
2004 |
10.9 |
10.3 |
10.4 |
9.3 |
9.3 |
9.8 |
9.8 |
9.3 |
8.9 |
9.1 |
9.1 |
9.1 |
9.6 |
2005 |
10.2 |
9.9 |
9.4 |
8.7 |
8.6 |
9.3 |
9.1 |
8.8 |
8.5 |
8.1 |
8.4 |
8.4 |
8.9 |
2006 |
9.2 |
9.0 |
8.5 |
7.9 |
7.9 |
8.7 |
8.8 |
8.3 |
7.6 |
7.6 |
7.8 |
7.8 |
8.2 |
2007 |
9.1 |
8.7 |
8.3 |
7.9 |
7.9 |
8.5 |
8.6 |
8.4 |
8.0 |
7.9 |
8.1 |
8.7 |
8.3 |
2008 |
9.9 |
9.5 |
9.3 |
8.9 |
9.4 |
10.3 |
10.8 |
10.7 |
10.6 |
11.1 |
12.2 |
13.5 |
10.5 |
2009 |
15.4 |
16.0 |
16.2 |
15.4 |
15.9 |
16.8 |
16.8 |
16.5 |
16.1 |
16.3 |
16.4 |
17.1 |
16.2 |
2010 |
18.0 |
17.9 |
17.5 |
16.6 |
16.1 |
16.7 |
16.8 |
16.4 |
16.2 |
15.9 |
16.3 |
16.6 |
16.7 |
2011 |
17.3 |
16.7 |
16.2 |
15.5 |
15.4 |
16.4 |
16.3 |
16.1 |
15.7 |
15.3 |
15.0 |
15.2 |
15.9 |
2012 |
16.2 |
The trend of our time is unmistakable–and as John Lennon once wrote, “Imagine no possessions…”
Early forms of the Neo-Feudalistic mechanism, known as the multinational entities, used lobbyists to bastardize electoral, scientific, and legal systems for the purpose of superseding the controls of a nation-state. We of the Futile Party further this process by tethering the forces of nature and humanity through duties defined via contracts. Thus, every entity is individually bound to serve the asset-owners in the fields, in the military, on the shop floor, or in the court–without owning anything!
Next in our platform, not only does the Futile Party support the evisceration of distributed wealth, it seeks a service caste protecting asset-holders. This way, only competition between key assets owners matters, which in our system, will be reduced to less than 1% of the population–thereby reducing the chance for strife. Could Heaven have made a more perfect gangway?
In its essence, Neo-Feudalism is a system of peace and tranquility for the masses because the various asset-holders commend themselves to economic goals. In times of strife, the beauty of Neo-Feudalism is the population is inconsequential to the decision process while the asset-holders are obliged to furnish a certain quantity of fighting persons, and weapons, to defend economic goals. Therefore, another plank in our Futile Platform is to let the wealthy command without interference from any nation. Economic goals provide the reason for defense of the masses, but only for a consideration based on the clarity that the protected person should acknowledge themselves to be judicially, politically, economically, socially, and morally dependent to the high protector.
Our Futile Platform also classifies rights in a graduated scheme based on wealth-tenure, a system in which asset-owners judge, tax, and command the class next below. Neo-Feudalism is in essence the structure of economic-servitude with a millennium-old contract-structure that facilitates the bullying of the lower classes while it privatizes rights.
So-called scholars have said that the contractual arrangements of Feudalism can lead to an assumption of sponsorship. That this leads to entities continually being defeated because “shire will not help shire”. We have also heard the left wing media and their “researchers” promote the socialist dogma saying the fall of Feudalism had been caused by group-heads forming an elite caste that dealt solely with other like-minded individuals, entering into relation only with other heads of groups. Then, viewing themselves as knowledgeable, these group-heads had battled with one another in private wars. Leading to instability in the system and a breakdown of loyalties, the breakdown exacerbated the oligarchy’s myopia–forcing them to lose contact with the members of other groups–opening and exposing their weaknesses to attack. We of the Futile Party believe this oversight of primitive social networks has no relevance due to the new computational landscape for social networks.
Further, the socialist dogma says that during Feudalism there was simply no recognition of why centralizing and unifying into a nation had merit. Their myth continues saying that this blindness led to asset-owners who were too feeble to defend themselves because there were no dependable allies. So weakened, the society was soon overrun, transitioning Feudalism into a period of social defeat that fostered the emergence of a class no longer tied to the wealth of asset-holders. Freed of the tie, an emerging class developed a system of trade outside the control of asset-owners. This reemergence of capital into the hands of commoners led to the Renaissance and its philosophers who would rediscover the practicality of rights for the individual person while reaffirming the need for cultivating strong nations.
How absurd is that? The concept of nation has no relevance today; except as a historical marker of mutual support for the protection of liberties and dignity for all humankind. Those polite ideals, as we have seen, with no way to pay the lobbying bills, are unimportant–just dark-age-buffoons–hardly tenets of our Feudalistic future.
In summation, our Futile Platform embraces the obliteration of principles, replacing them with economic goals. So get out and vote for the party that says economic might makes bullying right. After all, we now know a climate of mutual cooperation, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is idealistic mumbo-jumbo making our Futile Party Platform your only choice. Right?
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.